Talk:Twists with S and Z: Difference between revisions
*>DIGITAL No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The CW/CCW substitution for right/left seems to be a subjective issue so I'll leave it as is until I have enough inputs to decide. --[[User:DIGITAL|DIGITAL]] 19:59, 5 December 2007 (EST) | The CW/CCW substitution for right/left seems to be a subjective issue so I'll leave it as is until I have enough inputs to decide. --[[User:DIGITAL|DIGITAL]] 19:59, 5 December 2007 (EST) | ||
I agree that rotate left and right makes a lot more sense. Right and left are instinctive, so the reader automatically knows which way to go, but when I see CW or CCW, first he must discern whether is has one or two C's, then he must (typically) visualize a clock ticking. That's my process anyway. Voting left/right here. Maybe "rotate leftward" is better? [[User:66.157.54.221|66.157.54.221]] 21:55, 5 December 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 02:55, 6 December 2007
Rotation names
"CW" and "CCW" are hard to read. While "rotate left" and "rotate right" are slightly misleading, they are probably better here. Other options would be welcomed. --Lardarse 07:39, 5 December 2007 (EST)
The CW/CCW substitution for right/left seems to be a subjective issue so I'll leave it as is until I have enough inputs to decide. --DIGITAL 19:59, 5 December 2007 (EST)
I agree that rotate left and right makes a lot more sense. Right and left are instinctive, so the reader automatically knows which way to go, but when I see CW or CCW, first he must discern whether is has one or two C's, then he must (typically) visualize a clock ticking. That's my process anyway. Voting left/right here. Maybe "rotate leftward" is better? 66.157.54.221 21:55, 5 December 2007 (EST)